ENGINEERING FOR DEVELOPMENT

(First Draft)

 

E J Jefferies

 

March 1969



CONTENTS

PART 1 THE WORLD DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME

Chapter 1 Introduction
Chapter 2 Closing the Gap
Chapter 3 Resistance to Change
Chapter 4 International Technical Assistance

PART II AN ENGINEERING APPROACH TO A PLAN FOR A COUNTRY

Chapter 5 Outline of the Approach
Chapter 6 Setting the Problem
Chapter 7 Basic, Concepts, Terms and Definitions
Chapter 8 Background Data Available
Chapter 9 The Starting Point for a Case Study
Chapter 10 Preliminary Calculations
Chapter 11 Patterns of Economic Growth
Chapter 12 Development Plan for Year 1
Chapter 13 Development Plan for Year 2
Chapter 14 Development Plan for Year 3
Chapter 15 Review of Changes During the Three Years
Chapter 16 The Control of Development
Chapter 17 Financing the Development

 

 

PART III THE IMPLICATIONS OF RAPID GROWTH

Chapter 18 Economic Growth and Technological Changes in Rural Communities
Chapter 19 The Influence of Agriculture on Industrial Development
Chapter 20 The Role of Manufacturing Industry
Chapter 21 The Contribution of Industrial Engineering to a Solution

 

PART IV DESIGNING FOR BALANCE IN DEVELOPMENT


Chapter 22 The Prediction of New Manufacturing Capacity Requirements by Product Group
Chapter 23 The Productivity of Labour
Chapter 24 The Growth of Productivity
Chapter 25 The Calculation of Appropriate Levels of Productivity in New Plants

 

CHAPTER 14

 

DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR YEAR 3

 

6.1 We can now proceed to construct Table 24 allocating sectoral increases in YEAR 3 to different end uses on the same basis as in previous years.

 

TABLE 24 Trial Allocation of YEAR 3 Increases Between End Uses

 

 

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

 

SECTORAL VALUE ADDED

ALLOCATION OF INCREMENT TO:

     

CONSUMPTION

 
 

Year 2

$ m

Year 3

$ m

Increment

$ m

Export

$ m

Private

$ m

Govt and Infrastructure

$ m

Productive

Investment

$ m

Agriculture

231

260

29

11

18

-

-

Services, Trade and Govt

344

438

94

15

57

5

17

Manufacture

173

240

67

7

28

5

27

Miscellaneous

96

127

31

-

20

-

11

Transport, Storage and Communication

60

82

22

2

15

3

2

Construction

42

59

17

-

-

5

12

Mining

16

20

4

-

2

1

1

Totals

962

1226

264

35

140

19

70

Imports    

35

 

14

1

20

TOTAL        

154

20

90

 

Notes: Columns 1 and 2 are columns 3 and 4 of Table 7 rounded to whole numbers.

 

The Balance Between Production and Consumption

 

6.2 The total of column 5 Table 24 shows an increase in goods and services available for consumption of $154 m. This is about 58% of the increase in GDP, compared with 77% of the total for YEAR 0, 75% in YEAR 1 and 60% in YEAR 2. The allocation to Government consumption (7.6% of the increase) is slightly higher than last year but is still restricted. The allocation to productive investment continues at 34% of the increase (cf 4.3.2).

 

6.3 If the pattern for the disposal of value added in YEAR 2 shown in column 8 of Table 20 continues into YEAR 3, we can estimate the additional purchasing power generated by the increases required in each sector to meet the target growth and check this against the increased supplies shown in columns 5 and 6 of Table 23.

 

TABLE 25 Allocation of Increases Between Personal Incomes and Capital: YEAR 3

(pattern of productivity unchanged from YEAR 2)

 

 

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

     

ADDITIONAL RETURN TO:

 

Increase in

Net Output

$ m

Contribution of Labour to Net Output

%

Labour

$ m

Capital

$ m

Agriculture

29

81.3

23.6

5.4

Services, Trade and Govt

94

74.4

70.0

24.0

Manufacturing

67

63.9

42.8

24.2

Miscellaneous

31

64.1

19.8

11.2

Transport, Storage and Communication

22

73.4

16.2

5.8

Construction

17

71.0

12.0

5.0

Mining

4

72.5

2.9

1.1

Total

264

71.0

187.3

76.7

 

Notes: Column 1 is column 3 of Table 24.

Column 2 is column 8 of Table 20.

 

6.4 The gross purchasing power shown in column 3 of Table 25 at $187.3 m is higher than the available supplies allocated in columns 5 and 6 of Table 24 at $174 m and it will be necessary again to restrict purchasing power so that capital formation remains high (cf paragraph 4.8). We will repeat the pattern of allocation of the $13.3 m excess as in YEARS 1 and 2 between sectors, viz:

 

$4 m to the return to capital in Agriculture.

$4 m in Services, Trade and Government.

$2 m in Manufacturing.

$1 m in Miscellaneous.

$1 m in Transport, Storage and Communications.

$1 m in Construction.

$0.3 m in Mining.

 

On this basis we can rewrite Table 25 as Table 26.

 

TABLE 26 Allocation of Value Added Between Personal Incomes and Capital: YEAR 3

 

 

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8)

 

VALUE ADDED

RETURN IN YEAR 2

RETURN IN YEAR 3

CONTRIBUTION OF LABOUR TO NET OUTPUT

 

Year 2

$ m

Year 3

$ m

To Lab

$ m

To Cap

$ m

To Lab

$ m

To Cap

$ m

Year 2

%

Year 3

%

Agriculture

231

260

187.6

43.4

207.2

52.8

81.3

79.8

Services, Trade and Govt

344

438

255.9

88.1

321.9

116.1

74.4

73.4

Manufacturing

173

240

110.5

62.5

151.3

88.7

63.9

63.0

Miscellaneous

96

127

61.6

34.4

80.4

46.6

64.1

63.3

Transport, Storage and Communication

60

82

44.0

16.0

59.2

22.8

73.4

72.3

Construction

42

59

29.8

12.2

40.7

18.3

71.0

69.0

Mining

16

20

11.6

4.4

14.2

5.8

72.5

71.0

Total

962

1226

701.0

261.0

874.9

351.1

73.6

71.4

 

Notes: Columns 1 and 2 are columns 1 and 2 of Table 24.

Column 7 is column 8 of Table 20.

Column 3 is column 1 times column 7.

Column 4 is column 1 minus column 3.

  • Column 5 is column 3 plus column 3 of Table 25 minus the adjustment assumed in paragraph 6.4.
  • Column 6 is column 2 minus column 5.

    Column 8 is column 5 divided by column 2.

     

    Employment, Earnings and Productivity

     

    6.5 As for YEAR 2 we will assume that the agricultural labour force is reduced again by a further 12,000 to 366,000; and that earnings in other sectors increase again by about 10%. This enables us to construct Table 27.

     

    TABLE 27 Disposal of Sectoral Value Added; and Employment: YEAR 3

     

     

    (1)

    Net Product

    $ m

    (2)

    Contribution of Labour in Value Added

    %

    (3)

    Total Return to Labour

    $ m

    (4)

    Average Earnings per Worker

    $

    (5)

    Equivalent No in Full Employment

    No

    (6)

    Sectoral Productivity of Labour

    $/Worker/Yr

    Agriculture

    260

    79.8

    207.2

    567

    366,000

    710

    Service, Trade and Govt

    438

    73.4

    321.9

    1087

    296,000

    1480

    Manufacturing

    240

    63.0

    151.3

    980

    155,000

    1550

    Miscellaneous

    127

    63.3

    80.4

    823

    98,000

    1300

    Transport, Storage and Communication

    82

    72.3

    59.3

    1079

    55,000

    1490

    Construction

    59

    69.0

    40.7

    1023

    40,000

    1470

    Mining

    20

    71.0

    14.2

    1079

    13,000

    1540

    Total

    1226

    71.4

    75.0

    -

    1,023,000

    1200

     

    Notes: Column 1 is column 2 of Table 25.

    Column 2 is column 8 of Table 25.

    Column 3 is column 1 times column 2.

  • Column 4 is 110% of column 4 of Table 21, except for Agriculture.

    Column 5 is column 3 divided by column 4, except for Agriculture.

  • Column 6 is column 1 divided by column 5.

     

    Comments:

     

     

    Capital in YEAR 3

     

    6.6 From Table 13 we can expect $155 m of new investment to become productive during YEAR 3. This has to be made to produce an additional $264 m of Value Added and 91,300 new jobs.

     

    6.7 Again, additional investment in Agriculture will be needed to raise the productivity of labour in a reduced labour force and to produce $29 m of extra net output. The additional allocation of net output to capital in Agriculture this year is $9.4 m (Tables 21 and 26) so we can allocate $29 m of investment on the basis of a gross yield of 33%.

     

    6.8 This leaves $126 m of new investment becoming productive in all other sectors during YEAR 3 to generate $235 m of additional net product and 103,300 new jobs. We must therefore design and select new investments for this year to yield an average productivity of capital of 1.87 and an average investment per job for all sectors other than Agriculture of $1220 which is 22% higher than for YEAR 2.

     

    Prices Rises: Increase of Physical Output

     

    6.9 Conditions affecting the levels of prices especially the balance between production and final consumption will not have changed from YEAR 2 and we may assume that overall rises of 2.7% in agricultural prices and 1% in all others will apply. On this basis we can estimate the changes required in physical outputs, as shown in Table 28.

     

    TABLE 28 Changes in Physical Outputs: YEAR 2 to YEAR 3

     

     

    (1)

    Increase in Net Output

    (2)

    Rise in

    Price Level

    (3)

    Rise in Employment

    (4)

    Rise in Physical Output

    (5)

    Rise in Physical Output per Worker

    Agriculture

    1.127

    1.027

    0.968

    1.098

    1.133

    Service, Trade and Govt

    1.275

    1.010

    1.143

    1.262

    1.105

    Manufacturing

    1.388

    1.010

    1.250

    1.376

    1.105

    Miscellaneous

    1.350

    1.010

    1.195

    1.337

    1.120

    Transport, Storage and Communication

    1.368

    1.010

    1.225

    1.355

    1.107

    Construction

    1.405

    1.010

    1.250

    1.392

    1.112

    Mining

    1.250

    1.010

    1.102

    1.238

    1.123

    Total

    (excluding Agriculture)

    1.327

    1.010

    1.185

    1.316

    1.110

     

    Notes: Column 1 is from Table 24, column 2 divided by column 1.

    Column 3 is column 5 of Table 27 divided by column 5 of Table 22.

    Column 4 is column 1 divided by column 2.

    Column 5 is column 4 divided by column 3.